Nintendo Switch and Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Nintendo have released a new console – the Switch – and a flagship game to accompany the launch – The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. Once again they’ve produced a gem of a video game, and chained it to underpowered, pointlessly unique and astonishingly expensive hardware.

Title image

I used to be a total Nintendo fanboy, primarily off the back of Gameboy Pokemon and Zelda titles. I received a Pokemon branded Gameboy Colour and Pokemon Yellow for Christmas 1999 and I can still remember each year of the early 2000s by the Nintendo games released in it. But in the last decade, for me Nintendo have just been a total disappointment. As a result, I haven’t even been remotely tempted by the Wii, 3DS, Wii U, or the latest Switch.

My Nintendo collection
My Nintendo collection in 2006

You might think that I’ve just outgrown their childish games, but this emphatically isn’t the case. In the last year I’ve completed two full-length independently developed Pokemon games on a GBA emulator on my phone, re-played about halfway through Zelda: Wind Waker on the Dolphin Gamecube emulator for PC and spent an evening with friends on the multiplayer of Super Mario 64 DS and Mario Kart DS.

Pokemon Gaia
The fantastic Pokemon Gaia

In case it’s escaped you, the consensus is that Zelda: Breath of the Wild (not a Switch exclusive, but by far Nintendo’s biggest selling point for the new console) is amazeballs good. Even perennially pissed off cynic Yahtzee showered it with praise. We’re talking Portal levels of gaming sublimity here. Reading a review of it on I came upon this quote in the comments:

Nintendo’s niche is carved out by their first party games, not by their crappy hardware, but it feels like they don’t know that…

I agree completely, and I’m going to explore this sentiment further.


Once upon a time, everyone watched TV every evening. Internet was dial up and computers were eye-wateringly expensive for something that only helped you do office work more quickly. It made every sense to design and build your own console and plug it into the TV in the living room. When Nintendo released the Gameboy it was revolutionary – full games in the palm of your hand – and even as mobile phones infiltrated pockets everywhere, there remained no comparison between Metroid Prime Hunters (2006) on the DS and the latest iteration of Snake on a Nokia.

Advert for a used laptop from 1999
Advert for a used laptop from 1999

Broadband internet came. Everyone bought a home PC, then a personal laptop each, and in recent years a personal smartphone and family tablet.

Although I don’t personally have a Playstation or Xbox, I can see how Sony and Microsoft keep their insistence on proprietary hardware relevant. They encourage consumers to use their systems as media players – Youtube, iPlayer and Netflix have been on their devices for years and on launch in 2006 the PS3 was a Blu-Ray player for practically the same cost as a standalone device, with a whole console thrown in ‘for free’. In addition, they pack the very bleeding edge of graphics hardware into each system, subsidising them and selling at a loss, and heavily optimising games to run on them. The result of which is that today you can buy a brand new Xbox One and three high quality, graphically stunning games for £275, while the same hardware and games for PC would set you back two to three times more for a desktop and at least quadruple for a laptop.

What then for Nintendo, inventors of the home and portable console? They haven’t even attempted to compete on graphics; Wii and Wii U being quickly surpassed by mid-range laptops, and multiple handheld 3DS editions failing to keep pace with smartphone and tablet graphical oomph. They’ve neglected the media player aspect of their systems for years; repeatedly crippling online capabilities and never embracing Blu-Ray even as Microsoft bit the bullet and did. Yet they continue to ask top-dollar prices for their hardware. They’ve sometimes touted it’s benefits on physical fitness, or the novelty of its input methods, but by and large hold lovers of their in-house developed games to ransome; buy our hardware or go without!

Nintendo want 300 of your hard-earned pounds for a Switch, yet assuming the game were optimised for x86 architecture, even a ~£600 laptop bought today could run Zelda: Breath of the Wild more smoothly, as could any flagship smartphone of the last 18 months. These are devices that 95% of the target audience already own. In addition, the ‘innovative’ nature of the Switch – both a touch screen tablet running on a propriety operating system, and console that plugs into your TV – that is powered by an ARM processor rather than the now universal x86 instruction set for other home consoles and PCs and even Macs, means that developers other than Nintendo have no incentive at all to develop for or port games to the system. You will spend £300, and over the next five years, approximately one game per year will be released that you will want to buy.

Zelda: Wind Waker
Zelda: Wind Waker [Gamecube] (2003)
Beginning with Wind Waker on the Gamecube – a marginally, but never glaringly underpowered system compared to its rivals the PS2 and Xbox – Nintendo have always been very good at using striking art styles, cell shading and endearing animations to compensate for raw pixel pushing. But Breath of the Wild, when we look beyond these same stylistic tricks, is graphically not good enough. Environments are lacking the everyday detritus that has come as standard in open world games at least since 2012, faces don’t have anywhere near the detail needed to express emotional subtlety, and you will still experience slowdown (slowdown below 30(!) fps) and, if you ride too quickly towards the horizon on your horse, object pop-in. Needless to say, a game released on the Switch without Nintendo’s careful design decision and polish is going to look like something you want to scrape off the bottom of your shoe.

Skyrim [PC] (2011)
Far Cry 3
Far Cry 3 [PC] (2012)
Witcher 3
Witcher 3 [PC] (2015)
Zelda: Breath of the Wild [Switch] (2017)

Twilight Princess
Twilight Princess [Wii] (2006)
Zelda: Breath of the Wild [Switch] (2017)
Do these two screenshots reflect eleven(!) years of graphical hardware and efficiency improvements?

brand Value

As a PC gaming enthusiast, I would love to walk into Nintendo HQ and tell them to stop arsing about with stupid hardware gimmicks, streamline the business down to their incredibly talented game design and development teams, use their massive brand value and respect in the games industry to secure fantastic licensing deals on digital distribution networks like Steam and the Play store, and just make life-changing game after life-changing game. Nintendo, win a whole new generation to your side instead of milking the same old 20-40 year olds for nostalgia hits.

I think that, beyond their pride – oh Nintendo have enough pride to start a world war over the exact colour red of Mario’s cap, were they a country – Nintendo worry intently, the same way that Apple do, about being an aspirational brand, maintaining quality and diluting brand value.

My evidence to try and convince them, after talking about Apple’s decision to develop iTunes for Windows in 2003, and Lego’s (eventual) embrace of every different kind of media and licensing deal to sell their bricks, would be Pokemon Go.

How big was that game?

Nintendo IPs transfer so easily to mobile devices, and when they do, they explode! And that momentum propelled sales of Pokemon Sun and Moon, released a few months later on the now six year old 3DS system, through the roof.

Before you say it, smartphone games absolutely don’t need to be based around simplified, repetitive mechanics that you play in five minute spurts. Just look at the appetite for classics of mid-2000s PC gaming ported to Android. Star Wars: KOTOR (a very long and deep RPG from 2003) has 100k-500k installs through the Play store at £10 a pop and GTA: San Andreas (an equally enormous open world game from 2004) has 1-5million players at £5 each.

Just Make Games

Three things stand out for me about Nintendo games. Gameplay – it’s just always stellar. At times they’ve rehashed concepts that were once revolutionary but are now beginning to feel tired, but then we move onto their next asset. Polish – they really test environments, mechanics and pacing and get them just spot on. And finally, Storytelling – they create characters you care about, use them to drive forward the narrative, animate and voice-act them gorgeously, and regularly reinterpret them to give a different angle on the same hero.

None of these are reliant on special in-house hardware at all. They don’t require a touchscreen, or motion controls, or a controller that can be broken apart and reassembled like Lego – and which, like Lego, is never going to feel ergonomic in your hand, owing to its hard, straight, knobbly edges.

Freed from their expensive, onerous hardware requirements, every Nintendo game could be a headline-grabbing mega hit. Imagine, Nintendo, if you hadn’t just sunk however many millions of man hours and billions of Yen on a console that fills a niche that doesn’t exist and which, even by Nintendo console launches, has had a very ropey one (it’s 2017 and you can’t glue an antenna on properly?) Imagine that instead of 1.3 million people playing Zelda and hundreds of millions of others merely watching and reading about them, every 12-45 year old was playing Breath of the Wild, or talking about how soon they’ll be able to play it, or going round to their friend’s house to take turns on it.

Instead, the conversation again and again is; sure it’s worth £60, but £360? The Wii sat in the corner gathering dust most of it’s life. I was thinking that a VR headset would be my next hardware purchase. It doesn’t look very technically advanced, just polished, why can’t I play it on my phone instead of their weird cheap-feeling tablet thing? Two hours battery life? Uhh..I’ll wait and see.

But none of this is going to happen, so I’ll continue to sink hours into the cross-platform masterpiece that is Witcher 3 on my PC and look forward to thoroughly enjoying Breath of the Wild when it’s successfully ported to Dolphin in the next few years.

15 thoughts on “Nintendo Switch and Zelda: Breath of the Wild”

  1. I like your article and agree a lot with what you say.

    Nintendo are one of those few companies that still sell their old games at pretty much full RRP. They also make profit on their hardware unlike Sony and Microsoft.

    Nintendo fucked up with Wii U because they were complacent. They thought they would sell as many as the Wii but people just weren’t interested. They’ve given the Switch thought and I think it will do well regardless of graphics or processor speed. There are always those fan boys who sit there wanking off to their Peach and Daisy Amiibos that keep Nintendo going. Let’s be honest they’ve watched their rivals Sega disintegrate and have no interest in Mario appearing on any rival platform (since Sonic can be seen now on Nintendo consoles), so naturally keeping the brand self sustained in their own little family friendly bubble is key.

    I myself am a Pokémon fan and have recently purchased Sun (fuck me what a load of shite) but will always go back to Soul Silver or Omega Ruby for simply the nostalgia value and Nintendo are damn good at that. Pokémon Go was a genius idea, using the Ingress model for arguably the worlds most popular game. Although arguably it can be seen as a flash in the pan and making Nintendo very little money since Niantic, not Nintendo have taken at least £100 of my hard earned cash (as well as millions more). In 6 months time will Pokémon Go have the same huge audience? My partner had deleted the game until I got her back into it when Gen 2 arrived but I’m pretty sure people give less of a shit about Gen 3 and upwards (love you Salamance but fuck you ice cream cone and bunch of keys) so it will die off.

    If I see you again anytime soon we should totally give Mario Party 8 a go. I’ve watched a few Let’s Plays and it is what Nintendo are good at, although graphics just isn’t their thing as you rightly point out.

    1. I don’t know about ‘very little money’ from Pokemon Go. We don’t know what their licensing deal was with Niantic, and share price is up 70% from this time last year. (
      For an large, very mature business, that’s an insane level of growth and market interest.

      Early reports are indeed showing that the Switch is selling well, and Nintendo haven’t exactly gone bankrupt yet following that model – keep it all under control in their family friendly bubble – but I do think they could go from ‘a big player’ to ‘dominating the market’ if they just freed themselves a bit. But then part of it is selfishness, I would just love to play Nintendo games on my PC, at 1200p+, amazing graphics, no load times, easy downloads and updates through Steam…

      Yes Nintendo do very good group multiplayer fun, but ‘Homo Erectus’, who are you?!

        1. Ah wow that passed me by, ouch. They’ve still kept a lot of the gains in stock price from last summer though – it’s the Snapchat business model xD

  2. Awww… I really expected to hear good things about the Switch and new Zelda game but, alas, clearly not to be. Perhaps the hype was indeed just that.

    Thank you for taking the time to be so thorough in your review. Even if I still had hours upon hours of free time every day (ah, the wonders of childhood), I would be pursuing awesome gameplay which means I’d want awesome graphics.

    Instead, it sounds like Nintendo continue to milk the nostalgia cash cow when they could invest in being THE living room multiplayer console, which I for one would love.

    Are you going to keep the Switch for good?

    1. Cheers for commenting, I don’t actually have a Switch myself to keep, and the game is really good. It’s also on Wii U, with even slightly worse graphics and performance, so if you’ve got access to one of those that could be an option.

      Ah the wonders of limitless free time, many a summer holiday day spent exploring every aspect of a new game!

      Yes, I didn’t address that option here because I’m a total PC gaming convert now, but maybe Nintendo could pull off THE living console, if they really tried for it instead of these…things they produce :s

  3. 2012 – nintendo . HAHAHAHAHAHA i’m willing to bet you haven’t even touched a game console in your life. I’m a big fan of video games, played from old SNES up to ps3, 360, Wii pc etc of today and guess what all that experience has helped to push me into a career of programming and computer aided design. Ignorance hasn’t helped anybody get anywhere, ever.

  4. So, who wants to help me? England, UK, 2002 (give or take), SNES (one assumes), and RPG overworld game (I think). The question is, what game did I use to play? Help me find my memory. I am half thinking of a ‘marketplace’ and half thinking of ‘open fields’, finding monsters along the way — but I was 6 at the time, lest we forget. Not sure if the game was A Link to the Past, Breath of Fire II, Secret of Mana, Soul Blazer, or something else! Anybody know which were known/unknown at that time and place?

  5. I’m so excited for the SNES Classic, and even though I didn’t get a preorder it would have been great if these top 25 games would have been the preloaded one (Although most are). The only ones I felt deserved a spot were Actrasier, Mario Paint, Krustys Super Fun House, Killer Instinct and God forgive me Bubsy. I mean those were some of my SNES games of my childhood and I still think they’re great (No matter what anyone says) Overall though to this day I think the SNES was the best video game system to date!

  6. Vortex? Doom? Castlevania Dracula? SSF2? Barman returns? Syndicate? Saturday night slam masters?

    Also European/ japanese exclusives like terranigma. Cannon fodder. Sensible soccer. final fight 3….?

    And castlevania 4/harvest moon and donkey Kong country should not be down in the sub top 20… C’mon dude. Sacrifice one of ur beloved rpg’ s or Tetris… only chrono trig/Mario rpg/earthbound and of course zelda need to be in top 40 or so… (I hate final fantasy)

  7. I only ever played the super popular games, but some of these look really unique and fun. Basically, my dad still had a Super Nintendo from a while back, and I got into it. He only ever had like seven games; Super Metroid, Mega Man X, Chrono Trigger, Link to the Past, Castlevania, Earthbound and Super Mario World. At least, those are the ones that still worked. Anyway, if I were born like a decade earlier I think I would’ve enjoyed the more obscure games out there. Great list, though! :)

  8. well it’s my Favorite zelda game, Definitely more than a link to the past,is a grate game but while I play it something always stops me and that is WHAT THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO DO NEXT!?!?!? Its easy to get lost as to what you need and what you need to do, that’s why it’s my least Favorit

  9. All these games = fond childhood memories . Nintendo had so many quality games . The 90s was the golden age of gaming. Damnit makes me want to hunt down a snes now .I do have Roms but it’s not the same . … Btw Eye of the beholder was one of the greatest rpgs released for SNES.

  10. 25 is barely enough to do the SNES justice, there are other awesome games on there that could make the list more than some of the titles you had on there, games like Pilotwings, Sim City, ActRaiser 1+2, Soul Blazer, Illusion of Gaia, Terranigma, Lufia 1+2, Demon’s Crest, Secret of Evermore, Skyblazer, The Firemen, Legend of the Mystical Ninja, Stunt Race FX, Breath of Fire 1+2, Dragon View, Zombies ate my neighbors, Super Ghouls ‘n Ghosts, Killer Instinct, Lost Vikings 1+2, Shadowrun… So many good memories…

  11. I’m so happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.